Super mario rpg remake1/8/2024 Not with Nintendo allowing even indie developers to create games using their propertiesĬloud and Sephiroth may be in Smash but that doesn't mean Squeenix is easy to work with. Not with Sega Genesis games being licensed for Switch Online. Not with the deals between SE and Nintendo going this far with Cloud, Sephiroth, and Sora in smash. What do you place your money on?Ĭan it really be as simple as licensing with Square Enix? Maybe during the N64/GC era but not now. Remake? Sequel? Buried in the sand forever never to see the light of day? or maybe just a bullet being saved to keep people subscribed to NSO. Sometimes an absence of something foretells the future. with Square Enix have been plentiful proving relations between the companies are at an all time high. TLDR: There "should" be no damn reason we don't have SMRPG on NSO. Nintendo's tendencies support this SMRPG theory but.ill file this under "Makes too much sense for Nintendo to ever do". If Pikmin 4 gets announced for a 2022 release then P3D makes this entire thing more true. Xenoblade 1 setting up for Xenoblade 3 which is also now heavily rumored? Usually there is a year or so between the connections. Heavily rumored is the Metriod Prime 1 and 4 situation. Nintendo has shown they will hold back releases of ports to compliment a new game coming. More likely than the above explanations but I don't personally see it.Ĭomplete sequel in the form of a isometric 2D/3D HD game like Octopath Traveler/Triangle Strategy with NSO port arriving near it. The NES/SNES catalogue should be done and they've been releasing stuff nobody is gonna play recently as filler. I could see this reasoning being highly likely in 2019/2020 but not now. Ok, But when? Game Boy titles on NSO has been heavily rumored so that could take up next years "reason to resub". "The simplest explanation is usually the right one". Nintendo is just simply saving it as a future SNES update. I disagree with this theory because of ( ) So with no future, They would rather let it disappear into history. What if Nintendo believes its polygon/Isometric/backgroundless style is simply too important to the aesthetic of the game and does not translate well to HD development? Under that logic you would end up remaking a game unfaithful to the original. Money is a good reason why this is completely false but lets humor ourselves. Nintendo and Square Enix want it to disappear from the limelight. (GB games coming without Links Awakening? That would be telling) Even though we do not have a full remake and a port of old version example yet, I'll file this under unlikely until I see better examples. Pokemon Snap, Mario Golf/Tennis are more from the N64 pack with updated releases in the series on Switch already. Comes out with Super Mario 3D all stars which is no longer for sale and now is in the N64 pack. Have they held back other old games that turned out to have remakes or ports? Super Mario 64. One easy way to test this theory is looking at the current list of VC games. Nintendo is developing a full remake of the game and does not want any roms hurting sales. So what is the hold up? Why is Nintendo not putting Super Mario RPG on the SNES list for Switch Online? I'll go through a few obvious possibilities. Not with Nintendo allowing even indie developers to create games using their properties (Cadence of Hyrule). Why has Nintendo only been willing to provide a simple Wii/Wii-U virtual Console port (Plus SNES classic) since its release? Can it really be as simple as licensing with Square Enix? Maybe during the N64/GC era but not now. From Geno becoming a highly requested character in smash to outright demands for a direct sequel or even full remake.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |